stairs: have landings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.35
Siblings stairwell
Weight: 0.29
, staircase
Weight: 0.29
, basement
Weight: 0.28
, doorway
Weight: 0.28
, ground floor
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
have landings 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(stairs, have landings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(staircase, have landings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(stairs, have landings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(staircase, have landings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(staircase, have landings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(stairs, have landings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(stairs, have landings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(stairs, have landings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(stairs, have landings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(stairs, have landings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(stairs, have landings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(stairs, have landings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(stairs, have landings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(staircase, have landings)