stamen: has physical part organs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, symptom
Weight: 0.51
, reproductive organ
Weight: 0.51
, characteristic
Weight: 0.50
Siblings pistil
Weight: 0.40
, flower
Weight: 0.32
, ovary
Weight: 0.32
, petal
Weight: 0.32
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part organs 1.00
is essential organs 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pistil, is essential organs)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pistil, has physical part organs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pistil, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pistil, has physical part organs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pistil, is essential organs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(pistil, is essential organs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(stamen, has physical part organs)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(stamen, is essential organs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(stamen, is essential organs)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(stamen, is essential organs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(stamen, is essential organs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(stamen, has physical part organs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(stamen, has physical part organs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pistil, has physical part organs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(stamen, has physical part organs)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pistil, is essential organs)