standard: vary between different businesses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.66
, parameter
Weight: 0.65
, factor
Weight: 0.64
, mechanism
Weight: 0.63
Siblings quality
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.66
, guideline
Weight: 0.66
, method
Weight: 0.66
, definition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
vary between different businesses 1.00
vary between businesses 0.99
vary between countries 0.92
vary across countries 0.89
vary in areas 0.89
vary in urban areas 0.83
be different 0.82
affect businesses 0.82
differ around world 0.80
differ in bjt 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(factor, affect businesses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(concept, differ around world)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(factor, be different)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(concept, differ in bjt)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(factor, be different)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(concept, differ in bjt)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(concept, differ around world)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(factor, affect businesses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(factor, affect businesses)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(concept, differ around world)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(concept, differ in bjt)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(factor, be different)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(quality, vary in urban areas)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(factor, affect businesses)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(factor, be different)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(concept, differ around world)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(concept, differ in bjt)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(quality, vary in urban areas)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(quality, vary in urban areas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(standard, vary between different businesses)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(standard, vary between countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(standard, vary between countries)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(standard, vary across countries)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(standard, vary between countries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(standard, vary across countries)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(standard, vary across countries)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary across countries)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between countries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(concept, differ in bjt)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(factor, be different)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(concept, differ around world)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(factor, affect businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(quality, vary in urban areas)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(factor, be different)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(concept, differ in bjt)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(concept, differ around world)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(standard, vary between different businesses)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(factor, affect businesses)