staphylococcus aureus: be resistant to methicillin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bacterium
Weight: 0.81
, germ
Weight: 0.64
, pathogen
Weight: 0.63
, disease
Weight: 0.63
, nasty
Weight: 0.60
Siblings staphylococcus
Weight: 0.43
, streptococcus
Weight: 0.40
, clostridium
Weight: 0.38
, clostridium perfringens
Weight: 0.37
, vibrio cholerae
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be resistant to methicillin 1.00
be resistant to antibiotics 0.87
be resistant to penicillin 0.86
be resistant to lysozyme 0.83
is serious nosocomial pathogen 0.77
is nosocomial pathogen 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus, be resistant to penicillin)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus, be resistant to antibiotics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(staphylococcus, be resistant to antibiotics)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(staphylococcus, be resistant to antibiotics)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(staphylococcus, be resistant to penicillin)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(staphylococcus, be resistant to penicillin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to antibiotics)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to penicillin)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to lysozyme)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to antibiotics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, is serious nosocomial pathogen)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(staphylococcus aureus, is nosocomial pathogen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, is nosocomial pathogen)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to lysozyme)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to penicillin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to antibiotics)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to antibiotics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to lysozyme)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, is nosocomial pathogen)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to lysozyme)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to penicillin)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to penicillin)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(staphylococcus aureus, is nosocomial pathogen)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(staphylococcus aureus, is serious nosocomial pathogen)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, is serious nosocomial pathogen)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(staphylococcus aureus, is serious nosocomial pathogen)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(staphylococcus, be resistant to antibiotics)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(staphylococcus aureus, be resistant to methicillin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(staphylococcus, be resistant to penicillin)