stapler: be at hotel

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents item
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.57
, instrument
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.50
Siblings kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.34
, pocket knife
Weight: 0.34
, disposable razor
Weight: 0.33
, utensil
Weight: 0.33
, toaster
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hotel 1.00
be at hotel room 0.95
be at hotel bathroom 0.91
be at apartment 0.76
be at room 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(disposable razor, be at hotel room)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(disposable razor, be at hotel bathroom)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(disposable razor, be at hotel room) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(disposable razor, be at hotel room)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(disposable razor, be at hotel bathroom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(disposable razor, be at hotel bathroom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(stapler, be at hotel)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(stapler, be at apartment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(stapler, be at room)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(stapler, be at apartment)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(stapler, be at room)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(stapler, be at apartment)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at room)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at apartment)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(stapler, be at room)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at hotel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stapler, be at hotel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(disposable razor, be at hotel room)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(stapler, be at hotel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(disposable razor, be at hotel bathroom)