star: be visible by light they emit

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents talent
Weight: 0.67
, player
Weight: 0.64
, movie
Weight: 0.62
, film
Weight: 0.61
Siblings rock star
Weight: 0.70
, supernova
Weight: 0.69
, performer
Weight: 0.66
, prince
Weight: 0.65
, captain
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be visible by light they emit 1.00
be more visible at night 0.79
be visible at night 0.79
be most visible at night 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(star, be visible by light they emit)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(star, be most visible at night)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(star, be visible at night)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(star, be more visible at night)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(star, be visible at night)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(star, be more visible at night)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(star, be most visible at night)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(star, be visible at night)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(star, be more visible at night)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(star, be most visible at night)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(star, be most visible at night)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(star, be more visible at night)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(star, be visible at night)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(star, be visible by light they emit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(star, be visible by light they emit)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(star, be visible by light they emit)