starbucks: be example of popular culture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.36
, pepsi
Weight: 0.35
, grocery store
Weight: 0.34
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, convenience store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be example of popular culture 1.00
is popular 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(starbucks, be example of popular culture)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(brand, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(starbucks, be example of popular culture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(brand, is popular)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, is popular)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(brand, is popular)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is popular)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(fast food restaurant, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be example of popular culture)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(brand, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be example of popular culture)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(convenience store, is popular) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is popular)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(starbucks, be example of popular culture)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(starbucks, is popular)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(starbucks, is popular)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(starbucks, is popular)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, is popular)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be example of popular culture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(starbucks, be example of popular culture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brand, is popular)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is popular)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(convenience store, is popular)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brand, is popular)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(starbucks, be example of popular culture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, is popular)