starbucks: be good place work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.36
, pepsi
Weight: 0.35
, grocery store
Weight: 0.34
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, convenience store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place work 1.00
be bad for environment 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.04
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(starbucks, be good place work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(mcdonalds, be bad for environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(starbucks, be good place work)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(mcdonalds, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mcdonalds, be bad for environment)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(starbucks, be good place work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be good place work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(starbucks, be good place work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(mcdonalds, be bad for environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(starbucks, be good place work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be bad for environment)