starbucks: have tables

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents store
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.63
, company
Weight: 0.62
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.61
Siblings mcdonalds
Weight: 0.36
, pepsi
Weight: 0.35
, grocery store
Weight: 0.34
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.34
, convenience store
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tables 1.00
have small tables 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(starbucks, have tables)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(starbucks, have tables)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(starbucks, have tables)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(starbucks, have small tables)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(starbucks, have tables)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, have small tables)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(starbucks, have tables)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(starbucks, have small tables)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(starbucks, have tables)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(starbucks, have small tables)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(starbucks, have tables)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(starbucks, have tables)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(starbucks, have tables)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(starbucks, have tables)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(starbucks, have tables)