state: has city

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nation
Weight: 0.68
, district
Weight: 0.67
, country
Weight: 0.62
, plan
Weight: 0.61
Siblings county
Weight: 0.69
, supreme court
Weight: 0.68
, south dakota
Weight: 0.67
, soviet union
Weight: 0.64
, government
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
has city 1.00
be at city 0.95
be make up of city 0.85
has state 0.78
has large area of land 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(country, be make up of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(state, has city)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(country, has state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(state, has city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(country, has large area of land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(state, has city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(country, be make up of city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(country, has large area of land)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(country, has state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(country, be make up of city)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(country, has state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(country, has large area of land)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(government, be at city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(country, be make up of city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(state, has city)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(country, has state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(state, has city)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(country, has large area of land) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(state, has city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(government, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(government, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(state, has city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(state, has city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(state, has city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(country, has state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(country, be make up of city)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(country, has large area of land)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(government, be at city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(country, has state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(country, has large area of land)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(state, has city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(country, be make up of city)