statement: be at mail

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents remark
Weight: 0.70
, confession
Weight: 0.67
, document
Weight: 0.63
, correspondence
Weight: 0.61
Siblings bank statement
Weight: 0.75
, press
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.65
, today
Weight: 0.64
, call
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at mail 1.00
be at your voice mail 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(correspondence, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(statement, be at mail)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(correspondence, be at mail)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at mail)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(call, be at your voice mail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(bank statement, be at mail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(correspondence, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(statement, be at mail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(bank statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(bank statement, be at mail)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(call, be at your voice mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(call, be at your voice mail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(statement, be at mail)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(statement, be at mail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(statement, be at mail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(correspondence, be at mail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(bank statement, be at mail)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(call, be at your voice mail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(statement, be at mail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(correspondence, be at mail)