statement: be useful to employees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents remark
Weight: 0.70
, declaration
Weight: 0.68
, confession
Weight: 0.67
, document
Weight: 0.63
Siblings bank statement
Weight: 0.75
, disclaimer
Weight: 0.65
, press
Weight: 0.65
, testimony
Weight: 0.65
, recommendation
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful to employees 1.00
be for service useful 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(document, be for service useful)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(statement, be useful to employees)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(statement, be useful to employees)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(document, be for service useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(statement, be useful to employees)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(document, be for service useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(document, be for service useful)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(statement, be useful to employees)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(statement, be useful to employees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(statement, be useful to employees)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(statement, be useful to employees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(statement, be useful to employees)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(statement, be useful to employees)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(statement, be useful to employees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(statement, be useful to employees)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(statement, be useful to employees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(statement, be useful to employees)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(document, be for service useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(statement, be useful to employees)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(document, be for service useful)