staten island: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents island
Weight: 0.84
, city
Weight: 0.63
, area
Weight: 0.63
, location
Weight: 0.62
Siblings long island
Weight: 0.82
, rhode island
Weight: 0.46
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.42
, ellis island
Weight: 0.41
, solomon islands
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
have reputation 0.97
has quality bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(staten island, have bad reputation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(island, have bad reputation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(island, have bad reputation)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(rhode island, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(staten island, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(rhode island, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(rhode island, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(staten island, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(staten island, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(staten island, have reputation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(staten island, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(staten island, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(staten island, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(staten island, have reputation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(staten island, have reputation)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(staten island, have reputation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(staten island, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(staten island, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(island, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(rhode island, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(staten island, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(island, have bad reputation)