statistics: have bad name

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.62
, department
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.62
, field
Weight: 0.61
Siblings batting average
Weight: 0.69
, poll
Weight: 0.56
, era
Weight: 0.56
, batting
Weight: 0.52
, prevalence
Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad name 1.00
have name 0.93
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(statistics, have bad name)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(batting average, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(statistics, have bad name)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(era, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, have bad name)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(era, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(era, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, have bad name)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(batting average, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(batting average, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, have bad name)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(statistics, have bad name)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(statistics, have bad name)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(statistics, have bad name)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(statistics, have bad name)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(statistics, have bad name)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(statistics, have bad name)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(statistics, have bad name)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(era, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(statistics, have bad name)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(batting average, has quality bad)