statistics: were developed

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , department Weight: 0.62 , tool Weight: 0.62 , field Weight: 0.61
Siblings	batting average Weight: 0.69 , poll Weight: 0.56 , era Weight: 0.56 , batting Weight: 0.52 , prevalence Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property	Similarity
were developed	1.00
were invented	0.81
be created	0.76
is created	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(tool, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(statistics, were developed)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(field, be created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(statistics, were developed)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(department, is created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(statistics, were developed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(department, is created)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(field, be created)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(tool, were invented)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(tool, were invented)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(field, be created)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(department, is created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(poll, is created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(tool, were invented) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(statistics, were developed)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(field, be created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(statistics, were developed)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.31

Plausible(department, is created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(statistics, were developed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(poll, is created) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(poll, is created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Salient(statistics, were developed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.72

Salient(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(statistics, were developed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(statistics, were developed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(department, is created)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(field, be created)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(tool, were invented)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(poll, is created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(department, is created)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(field, be created)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.54

Typical(statistics, were developed) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(tool, were invented)