steakhouse: be used to date

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, place
Weight: 0.49
, business
Weight: 0.48
, company
Weight: 0.43
, location
Weight: 0.40
Siblings seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.39
, deli
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to date 1.00
be used to meet someone for date 0.88
be used to impress new date 0.84
be used to impress date 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(restaurant, be used to meet someone for date)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to date)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be used to impress new date)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to date)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to meet someone for date)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to impress new date)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to meet someone for date)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to impress new date)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to impress date)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(restaurant, be used to meet someone for date)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be used to date)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(restaurant, be used to impress new date)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(steakhouse, be used to date)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to impress date)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to impress date)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(steakhouse, be used to date)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to date)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(steakhouse, be used to date)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to meet someone for date)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to impress new date)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to impress date)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to meet someone for date)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(steakhouse, be used to date)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to impress new date)