steam: be good for cold

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water vapor
Weight: 0.61
, steam engine
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, heat
Weight: 0.57
Siblings heat pump
Weight: 0.34
, locomotive
Weight: 0.34
, momentum
Weight: 0.33
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.33
, heat sink
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for cold 1.00
come off hot food 0.77
is hot 0.76
is freezing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(heat, is hot)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(steam, be good for cold)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(heat, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(heat, is hot)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(heat pump, is freezing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(heat, is hot)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(steam, be good for cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(heat pump, is freezing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(heat pump, is freezing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(steam, be good for cold)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(steam, come off hot food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(steam, come off hot food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(steam, come off hot food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(steam, is freezing)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(steam, is freezing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(steam, is freezing)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(steam, is freezing)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(steam, is hot)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(steam, is hot)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(steam, come off hot food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(steam, is hot)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(steam, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(steam, be good for cold)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(steam, be good for cold)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(heat, is hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(heat pump, is freezing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(steam, be good for cold)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(heat, is hot)