steam: be more effective than water

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents water vapor
Weight: 0.61
, steam engine
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, heat
Weight: 0.57
Siblings heat pump
Weight: 0.34
, locomotive
Weight: 0.34
, momentum
Weight: 0.33
, blow dryer
Weight: 0.33
, heat sink
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more effective than water 1.00
be more effective than water for use 0.98
be more effective than hot water 0.95
be more effective than hot water for use 0.94
be more dangerous than water 0.89
be more effective than water for use in heating systems 0.89
be more effective than hot water for use in heating systems 0.87
be more expensive than opskins 0.85
be less dense than water 0.84
be worse than water 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(steam, be more effective than water)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(steam, be more dangerous than water)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(steam, be worse than water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(steam, be more dangerous than water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(steam, be worse than water)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(steam, be more effective than hot water for use in heating systems)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(steam, be less dense than water)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(steam, be worse than water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(steam, be less dense than water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(steam, be less dense than water)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(steam, be more dangerous than water)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(steam, be more effective than hot water for use in heating systems)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(steam, be less dense than water)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(steam, be more effective than hot water for use in heating systems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(steam, be more effective than hot water for use in heating systems)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(steam, be more dangerous than water)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(steam, be worse than water)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(steam, be more effective than water)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(steam, be more effective than water)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(steam, be more effective than water)