stem: help plant

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stem cell
Weight: 0.57
, part
Weight: 0.55
, topic
Weight: 0.55
, matter
Weight: 0.52
Siblings white blood cell
Weight: 0.31
, root
Weight: 0.31
, shield
Weight: 0.31
, blood cell
Weight: 0.31
, red blood cell
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
help plant 1.00
have plant 0.95
have brown plant 0.87
differ from plant 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(root, help plant)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(root, help plant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(root, help plant)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(stem, help plant)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(stem, have plant)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(stem, have plant)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(stem, have plant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(stem, differ from plant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(stem, have brown plant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(stem, differ from plant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(stem, differ from plant)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(stem, have brown plant)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(stem, have brown plant)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(stem, have plant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stem, have brown plant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(stem, differ from plant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(stem, help plant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(stem, help plant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(stem, help plant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(root, help plant)