step: be from hell

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.67
, part
Weight: 0.67
, action
Weight: 0.62
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings move
Weight: 0.67
, appointment
Weight: 0.67
, challenge
Weight: 0.64
, process
Weight: 0.63
, planning
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be from hell 1.00
be from hell good 0.97
be different from right thought in eight path of buddhism 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, be different from right thought in eight path of buddhism)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(step, be from hell)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(action, be different from right thought in eight path of buddhism)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(action, be different from right thought in eight path of buddhism)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, be different from right thought in eight path of buddhism)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(step, be from hell)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(step, be from hell)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(step, be from hell good)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(step, be from hell good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(step, be from hell good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(step, be from hell good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(step, be from hell)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(step, be from hell)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(action, be different from right thought in eight path of buddhism)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(step, be from hell)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(action, be different from right thought in eight path of buddhism)