step: be stopping

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents obstacle
Weight: 0.67
, part
Weight: 0.67
, action
Weight: 0.62
, aspect
Weight: 0.61
Siblings move
Weight: 0.67
, appointment
Weight: 0.67
, challenge
Weight: 0.64
, process
Weight: 0.63
, planning
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be stopping 1.00
stopping violence 0.84
be stopped in stomach 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(action, be stopped in stomach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(step, be stopping)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(action, be stopped in stomach)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(action, be stopped in stomach)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(action, be stopped in stomach) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(step, be stopping)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(step, be stopping)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(step, stopping violence)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(step, stopping violence)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(step, stopping violence)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(step, stopping violence)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(step, be stopping)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(step, be stopping)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(action, be stopped in stomach)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(step, be stopping) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(action, be stopped in stomach)