stereotype: affect way

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents attitude
Weight: 0.64
, word
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, image
Weight: 0.53
Siblings jock
Weight: 0.59
, hippie
Weight: 0.48
, emo
Weight: 0.43
, cliche
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect way 1.00
affect lives 0.79
affect person 's behavior 0.77
affect men 's value 0.76
mean 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cliche, mean)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(emo, mean)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(cliche, mean)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cliche, mean)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(emo, mean)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(emo, mean)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(stereotype, affect way)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(stereotype, affect men 's value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(stereotype, affect men 's value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(stereotype, affect men 's value)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(stereotype, affect lives)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(stereotype, affect lives)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(stereotype, mean)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(stereotype, mean)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(stereotype, mean)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(stereotype, affect person 's behavior)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(stereotype, mean)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(stereotype, affect men 's value)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(stereotype, affect person 's behavior)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(stereotype, affect person 's behavior)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(stereotype, affect lives)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(stereotype, affect person 's behavior)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(stereotype, affect lives)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stereotype, affect way)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(stereotype, affect way)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(cliche, mean)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(stereotype, affect way)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(emo, mean)