steve jobs: be consider smart

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.65
, genius
Weight: 0.63
, ceo
Weight: 0.63
, entrepreneur
Weight: 0.63
Siblings steve
Weight: 0.36
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.35
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.34
, alot
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be consider smart 1.00
be smart 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(genius, be smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(steve jobs, be consider smart)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(genius, be smart)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(genius, be smart)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(genius, be smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, be consider smart)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(steve jobs, be consider smart)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, be smart)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(steve jobs, be smart)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, be smart)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(steve jobs, be smart)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, be consider smart)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(steve jobs, be consider smart)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(genius, be smart)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(steve jobs, be consider smart) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(genius, be smart)