steve jobs: is bad guy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.65
, genius
Weight: 0.63
, ceo
Weight: 0.63
, entrepreneur
Weight: 0.63
Siblings steve
Weight: 0.36
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.35
, albert einstein
Weight: 0.34
, alot
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad guy 1.00
is guy 0.96
was better than everyone else 0.76
help with lol play 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(steve jobs, is bad guy)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(steve jobs, is guy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, is guy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, help with lol play)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, help with lol play)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(steve jobs, help with lol play)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(steve jobs, help with lol play)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(steve jobs, was better than everyone else)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, was better than everyone else)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(steve jobs, is guy)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(steve jobs, was better than everyone else)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(steve jobs, was better than everyone else)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, is guy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(steve jobs, is bad guy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(steve jobs, is bad guy)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(steve jobs, is bad guy)