steve: draw analogy between viewers of film

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.59
, friend
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.58
, colleague
Weight: 0.57
Siblings steve jobs
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.36
, john smith
Weight: 0.36
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
draw analogy between viewers of film 1.00
draw analogy between viewers 0.98
draw analogy 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(steve, draw analogy between viewers)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(steve, draw analogy)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(steve, draw analogy between viewers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(steve, draw analogy between viewers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(steve, draw analogy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(steve, draw analogy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(steve, draw analogy between viewers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(steve, draw analogy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(steve, draw analogy between viewers of film)