steve: has state jobs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.59
, friend
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.58
, colleague
Weight: 0.57
Siblings steve jobs
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.36
, john smith
Weight: 0.36
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state jobs 1.00
is jobs important 0.92
was name jobs 0.87
was last name jobs 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(steve, has state jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(steve, was name jobs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(steve, is jobs important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(steve, was last name jobs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(steve, was name jobs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(steve, was name jobs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(steve, was last name jobs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(steve, was last name jobs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(steve, is jobs important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(steve, was name jobs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(steve, was last name jobs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(steve, is jobs important)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(steve, is jobs important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(steve, has state jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(steve, has state jobs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(steve, has state jobs)