steve: is rogers nomad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.59
, friend
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.58
, colleague
Weight: 0.57
Siblings steve jobs
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.36
, john smith
Weight: 0.36
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is rogers nomad 1.00
is nomad 0.89
is rogers 0.85
is rogers hydra 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(steve, is rogers nomad)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(steve, is rogers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(steve, is rogers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(steve, is rogers hydra)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(steve, is rogers hydra)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(steve, is nomad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(steve, is rogers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(steve, is rogers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(steve, is nomad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(steve, is rogers hydra)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(steve, is rogers hydra)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(steve, is nomad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(steve, is nomad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(steve, is rogers nomad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(steve, is rogers nomad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(steve, is rogers nomad)