steve: was guilty in story

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.59
, friend
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
, artist
Weight: 0.58
, colleague
Weight: 0.57
Siblings steve jobs
Weight: 0.36
, adam smith
Weight: 0.36
, john smith
Weight: 0.36
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was guilty in story 1.00
was guilty in monster 0.89
be guilty in monster 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(steve, was guilty in story)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(steve, was guilty in monster)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(steve, was guilty in monster)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(steve, was guilty in monster)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(steve, be guilty in monster)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(steve, be guilty in monster)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(steve, be guilty in monster)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(steve, was guilty in monster)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(steve, be guilty in monster)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(steve, was guilty in story)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(steve, was guilty in story) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(steve, was guilty in story)