stick: be used to play hockey

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.64
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, solid
Weight: 0.62
, tool
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hockey stick
Weight: 0.64
, glue stick
Weight: 0.37
, pencil
Weight: 0.33
, hammer
Weight: 0.33
, keep
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to play hockey 1.00
be at hockey game 0.97
be used to play game call hockey 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hockey stick, be used to play hockey)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(hockey stick, be at hockey game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hockey stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hockey stick, be used to play hockey)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(hockey stick, be at hockey game)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(hockey stick, be at hockey game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(stick, be used to play hockey)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(stick, be used to play game call hockey)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(stick, be used to play game call hockey)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to play game call hockey)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(stick, be used to play game call hockey)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to play hockey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(stick, be used to play hockey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(hockey stick, be at hockey game)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(stick, be used to play hockey)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(hockey stick, be used to play hockey)