stock: be known as high risk food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stock option
Weight: 0.73
, investment
Weight: 0.61
, currency
Weight: 0.59
, correction
Weight: 0.59
Siblings stock market
Weight: 0.69
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, capital
Weight: 0.59
, bhp billiton
Weight: 0.52
, ba
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be known as high risk food 1.00
is high risk 0.89
is risk 0.84
be considered risky 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(investment, be considered risky)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(stock, be known as high risk food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, is risk)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(stock, be known as high risk food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(investment, is risk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(investment, be considered risky)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(investment, be considered risky)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(investment, is risk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(investment, is risk)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(stock, be known as high risk food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(investment, be considered risky)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(stock, be known as high risk food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(stock, be known as high risk food)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(stock, is high risk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(stock, is risk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(stock, is risk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(stock, is risk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(stock, is risk)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(stock, is high risk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(stock, is high risk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(stock, is high risk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be known as high risk food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(stock, be known as high risk food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, is risk)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(investment, be considered risky)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(investment, is risk)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(stock, be known as high risk food)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(investment, be considered risky)