stockholm: be considered smart city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.61
, capital
Weight: 0.58
, city
Weight: 0.57
, location
Weight: 0.53
, united states
Weight: 0.50
Siblings bahrain
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.33
, ethiopia
Weight: 0.33
, kuwait
Weight: 0.33
, central african republic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered smart city 1.00
be considered city 0.87
is city 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(stockholm, be considered smart city)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(capital, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(stockholm, be considered smart city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(capital, is city)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(capital, is city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(city, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(venice, is city)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(venice, be considered city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(city, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(stockholm, be considered smart city)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(capital, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(stockholm, be considered smart city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(venice, be considered city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(venice, be considered city)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(venice, is city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(venice, is city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(stockholm, be considered smart city)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(stockholm, be considered city)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(stockholm, is city)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be considered city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(stockholm, be considered city)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(stockholm, be considered city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(stockholm, is city)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, is city)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(stockholm, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(stockholm, be considered smart city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(capital, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(venice, be considered city)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(venice, is city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(city, is city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(stockholm, be considered smart city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(capital, is city)