stone: were castles better than motte bailey castles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.63
, substance
Weight: 0.59
, vessel
Weight: 0.58
, medium
Weight: 0.58
, garden
Weight: 0.57
Siblings concrete
Weight: 0.60
, stele
Weight: 0.36
, vegetable garden
Weight: 0.32
, pottery
Weight: 0.32
, coin
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were castles better than motte bailey castles 1.00
were castles better than motten bailey ones 0.96
were good castles 0.94
castles hard to attack 0.89
were keep castles attacked 0.87
building norman castle 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(stone, were castles better than motten bailey ones)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(stone, were castles better than motten bailey ones)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(stone, were castles better than motten bailey ones)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(stone, castles hard to attack)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(stone, were castles better than motten bailey ones)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(stone, castles hard to attack)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(stone, castles hard to attack)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(stone, castles hard to attack)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stone, were castles better than motte bailey castles)