stool: be at internet cafe

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seat
Weight: 0.57
, object
Weight: 0.56
, bar stool
Weight: 0.56
, sample
Weight: 0.55
Siblings chair
Weight: 0.33
, airplane seat
Weight: 0.32
, seat belt
Weight: 0.32
, doorknob
Weight: 0.32
, toilet seat
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at internet cafe 1.00
be at restaurant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bar stool, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(stool, be at internet cafe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(bar stool, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(bar stool, be at restaurant)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(chair, be at internet cafe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(bar stool, be at restaurant) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(stool, be at internet cafe)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(chair, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chair, be at internet cafe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(stool, be at internet cafe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(stool, be at internet cafe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(stool, be at internet cafe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at restaurant)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(chair, be at internet cafe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(stool, be at internet cafe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(bar stool, be at restaurant)