stool: is hard

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seat
Weight: 0.57
, object
Weight: 0.56
, bar stool
Weight: 0.56
, sample
Weight: 0.55
Siblings chair
Weight: 0.33
, airplane seat
Weight: 0.32
, seat belt
Weight: 0.32
, doorknob
Weight: 0.32
, toilet seat
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hard 1.00
is hard difficult 0.94
become hard 0.88
is hard giving 0.84
is hard small balls 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(airplane seat, is hard)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(airplane seat, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(airplane seat, is hard)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(stool, is hard)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(stool, is hard difficult)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(stool, is hard difficult)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(stool, is hard difficult)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(stool, become hard)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(stool, become hard)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(stool, become hard)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(stool, is hard small balls)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(stool, is hard small balls)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(stool, is hard small balls)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(stool, is hard difficult)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(stool, become hard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(stool, is hard small balls)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(stool, is hard)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(stool, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(stool, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(airplane seat, is hard)