store: ask for i d

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents convenience store
Weight: 0.81
, restaurant
Weight: 0.61
, area
Weight: 0.57
, business
Weight: 0.57
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.80
, clothing store
Weight: 0.76
, hardware store
Weight: 0.75
, home depot
Weight: 0.74
, drugstore
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
ask for i d 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(store, ask for i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(home depot, ask for i d)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(store, ask for i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(home depot, ask for i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(home depot, ask for i d)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(store, ask for i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(store, ask for i d)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(store, ask for i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(store, ask for i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(store, ask for i d)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(store, ask for i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(store, ask for i d)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(store, ask for i d) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(home depot, ask for i d)