store: charge for bags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents convenience store
Weight: 0.81
, restaurant
Weight: 0.61
, area
Weight: 0.57
, business
Weight: 0.57
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.80
, clothing store
Weight: 0.76
, hardware store
Weight: 0.75
, home depot
Weight: 0.74
, drugstore
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
charge for bags 1.00
charge for paper bags 0.95
put alcohol in paper bags 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, charge for bags)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(grocery store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(grocery store, charge for bags)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(store, charge for bags)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(store, charge for paper bags)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(store, charge for paper bags)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(store, charge for paper bags)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(store, charge for paper bags)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(store, put alcohol in paper bags)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(store, put alcohol in paper bags)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(store, put alcohol in paper bags)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(store, put alcohol in paper bags)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(store, charge for bags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(store, charge for bags)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(store, charge for bags) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(grocery store, charge for bags)