store: check receipt at door

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents convenience store
Weight: 0.81
, restaurant
Weight: 0.61
, area
Weight: 0.57
, business
Weight: 0.57
Siblings grocery store
Weight: 0.80
, clothing store
Weight: 0.76
, hardware store
Weight: 0.75
, home depot
Weight: 0.74
, drugstore
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
check receipt at door 1.00
lock one door 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(restaurant, lock one door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(store, check receipt at door)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(restaurant, lock one door)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, lock one door)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(restaurant, lock one door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(store, check receipt at door)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(store, check receipt at door)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(store, lock one door)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(store, lock one door)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(store, lock one door)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(store, lock one door)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(store, check receipt at door)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(store, check receipt at door)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(restaurant, lock one door)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(store, check receipt at door) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(restaurant, lock one door)