storm: be associated with low pressure

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad weather
Weight: 0.66
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, emergency
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
Siblings typhoon
Weight: 0.74
, tornado
Weight: 0.71
, hurricane
Weight: 0.66
, rita
Weight: 0.63
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be associated with low pressure 1.00
have low pressure 0.92
form in low pressure 0.90
differ in low pressure 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(storm, be associated with low pressure)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(bad weather, be associated with low pressure)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(bad weather, be associated with low pressure)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(bad weather, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(storm, be associated with low pressure)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(storm, be associated with low pressure)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(storm, have low pressure)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(storm, have low pressure)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(storm, differ in low pressure)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(storm, differ in low pressure)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(storm, differ in low pressure)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(storm, have low pressure)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(storm, differ in low pressure)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(storm, have low pressure)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(storm, be associated with low pressure)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(storm, be associated with low pressure)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bad weather, be associated with low pressure)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(storm, be associated with low pressure)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(bad weather, be associated with low pressure)