storm: be common at fronts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bad weather
Weight: 0.66
, catastrophe
Weight: 0.63
, event
Weight: 0.61
, emergency
Weight: 0.59
, character
Weight: 0.58
Siblings typhoon
Weight: 0.74
, tornado
Weight: 0.71
, hurricane
Weight: 0.66
, rita
Weight: 0.63
, thunderstorm
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
be common at fronts 1.00
occur along fronts 0.89
be more common at night 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(thunderstorm, be more common at night)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(thunderstorm, be more common at night) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(thunderstorm, be more common at night)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(storm, be common at fronts)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(storm, occur along fronts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(storm, occur along fronts)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(storm, occur along fronts)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(storm, be more common at night)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(storm, be more common at night)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(storm, be more common at night)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(storm, be more common at night)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(storm, occur along fronts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(storm, be common at fronts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(storm, be common at fronts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(storm, be common at fronts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(thunderstorm, be more common at night)