story: be in nothing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tale
Weight: 0.76
, fairy tale
Weight: 0.71
, article
Weight: 0.66
, topic
Weight: 0.66
Siblings jonah
Weight: 0.68
, genesis
Weight: 0.66
, myth
Weight: 0.65
, cinderella
Weight: 0.65
, gossip
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in nothing 1.00
be like little 0.79
be like little red 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tale, be like little red)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(story, be in nothing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tale, be like little)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(story, be in nothing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tale, be like little)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(tale, be like little red)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(tale, be like little)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(tale, be like little red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(tale, be like little)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(story, be in nothing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(tale, be like little red)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(story, be in nothing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(story, be in nothing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(story, be in nothing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(story, be in nothing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(tale, be like little)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tale, be like little red)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(tale, be like little)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(story, be in nothing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tale, be like little red)