stranger: fall in love

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, character
Weight: 0.59
Siblings one person
Weight: 0.34
, guy
Weight: 0.33
, gentleman
Weight: 0.33
, homeless person
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
fall in love 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(stranger, fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(guy, fall in love)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(stranger, fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(guy, fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(guy, fall in love)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(stranger, fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(stranger, fall in love)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(stranger, fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(stranger, fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(stranger, fall in love)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(stranger, fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(stranger, fall in love)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(stranger, fall in love) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(guy, fall in love)