strategy: be evaluated pdf

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be evaluated pdf 1.00
is evaluated 0.90
is pdf 0.83
is reviewed 0.80
need reviewed 0.80
be important in workplace pdf 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(policy, be important in workplace pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(strategy, be evaluated pdf)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(policy, need reviewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(strategy, be evaluated pdf)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(policy, is reviewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(strategy, be evaluated pdf)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(policy, is reviewed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(policy, need reviewed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in workplace pdf)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in workplace pdf)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(policy, need reviewed)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(policy, is reviewed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(policy, be important in workplace pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(strategy, be evaluated pdf)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(policy, need reviewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(strategy, be evaluated pdf)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(policy, is reviewed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(strategy, be evaluated pdf)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(strategy, be evaluated pdf)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(strategy, is evaluated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(strategy, is evaluated)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(strategy, is evaluated)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is evaluated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(strategy, be evaluated pdf)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, is reviewed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, need reviewed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(policy, be important in workplace pdf)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, is reviewed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, need reviewed)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(strategy, be evaluated pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(policy, be important in workplace pdf)