strategy: change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
change 1.00
go change 0.93
change over time 0.87
was management change 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(policy, change)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(strategy, change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(policy, go change)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(strategy, change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(objective, change over time)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(strategy, change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(policy, change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(policy, go change)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(objective, change over time)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(objective, change over time)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(policy, go change)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, change)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(marketing, was management change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(policy, change)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(strategy, change)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(policy, go change)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(strategy, change)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(objective, change over time)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(strategy, change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(marketing, was management change)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(marketing, was management change)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(strategy, change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(strategy, change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, change)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, go change)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(objective, change over time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(marketing, was management change)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(policy, change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(policy, go change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(strategy, change)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(objective, change over time)