strategy: is difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents method
Weight: 0.67
, objective
Weight: 0.65
, plan
Weight: 0.65
, policy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings approach
Weight: 0.70
, planning
Weight: 0.69
, framework
Weight: 0.68
, marketing
Weight: 0.65
, consolidation
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult 1.00
make difficult 0.95
is hard 0.82
is stressful 0.79
be important in counselling 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(method, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(strategy, is difficult)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(policy, make difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(strategy, is difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(policy, make difficult)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(method, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(policy, make difficult)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(method, is hard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(planning, is difficult)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(marketing, is difficult)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(planning, is stressful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(planning, is hard)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(policy, make difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(strategy, is difficult)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(method, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(strategy, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(marketing, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(marketing, is difficult)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(planning, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(planning, is difficult)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(planning, is hard) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(planning, is hard)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(planning, is stressful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(planning, is stressful)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(framework, be important in counselling)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(strategy, is difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(strategy, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(policy, make difficult)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(method, is hard)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(marketing, is difficult)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(planning, is difficult)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(planning, is stressful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(planning, is hard)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(framework, be important in counselling)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(policy, make difficult)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(strategy, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(method, is hard)