stream: has state erosion

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents channel
Weight: 0.64
, shallow water
Weight: 0.63
, source
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.57
Siblings creek
Weight: 0.73
, river
Weight: 0.70
, audio
Weight: 0.60
, brook trout
Weight: 0.59
, bull run
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state erosion 1.00
cause erosion 0.92
erode 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(river, erode)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(river, cause erosion)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(river, cause erosion)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(river, cause erosion)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(river, erode)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(river, erode)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(stream, has state erosion)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(stream, cause erosion)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(stream, erode)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(stream, cause erosion)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(stream, erode)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(stream, erode)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(stream, cause erosion)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(stream, cause erosion)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(stream, erode)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stream, has state erosion)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(stream, has state erosion)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(river, erode)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(stream, has state erosion)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(river, cause erosion)