street: be closed in chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scene
Weight: 0.63
, highway
Weight: 0.62
, roadway
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, cross street
Weight: 0.61
Siblings alley
Weight: 0.65
, driveway
Weight: 0.60
, sidewalk
Weight: 0.35
, neighborhood
Weight: 0.35
, interstate highway
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be closed in chicago 1.00
be closed in nyc 0.88
be closed in philadelphia 0.87
is 41 in wisconsin closed 0.86
be closed in manhattan 0.85
be closed in oregon 0.81
be wet on csi miami 0.79
be closed in midtown nyc 0.79
is nyc 0.78
is orlando 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(highway, is 41 in wisconsin closed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(street, be closed in chicago)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(highway, be closed in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(street, be closed in chicago)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(highway, is 41 in wisconsin closed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(highway, be closed in oregon)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(highway, is 41 in wisconsin closed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(highway, be closed in oregon)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be wet on csi miami)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(alley, is orlando)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, is nyc)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(alley, is nyc)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(highway, is 41 in wisconsin closed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(street, be closed in chicago)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(highway, be closed in oregon) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(street, be closed in chicago)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(sidewalk, be wet on csi miami) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be wet on csi miami)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(alley, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(alley, is nyc)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(alley, is orlando) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(alley, is orlando)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sidewalk, is nyc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, is nyc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(street, be closed in chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in nyc)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(street, be closed in nyc)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(street, be closed in nyc)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in midtown nyc)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(street, be closed in midtown nyc)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(street, be closed in midtown nyc)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in manhattan)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(street, be closed in manhattan)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in philadelphia)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(street, be closed in manhattan)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(street, be closed in nyc)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(street, be closed in philadelphia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(street, be closed in midtown nyc)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(street, be closed in philadelphia)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(street, be closed in manhattan)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(street, be closed in philadelphia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(street, be closed in chicago)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(highway, is 41 in wisconsin closed)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(highway, be closed in oregon)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be wet on csi miami)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(alley, is orlando)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sidewalk, is nyc)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(alley, is nyc)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(highway, is 41 in wisconsin closed)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(street, be closed in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(highway, be closed in oregon)