strike: be in arizona

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.66
, attack
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.61
, fight
Weight: 0.60
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings raid
Weight: 0.33
, boycott
Weight: 0.33
, dismissal
Weight: 0.32
, counterattack
Weight: 0.32
, blast
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in arizona 1.00
be in michigan 0.82
be in illinois 0.80
be in chicago 0.76
is jackson kevin hart 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(action, is jackson kevin hart)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strike, be in arizona)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(action, is jackson kevin hart)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(action, is jackson kevin hart)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(action, is jackson kevin hart)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(strike, be in arizona)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(strike, be in arizona)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(strike, be in michigan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(strike, be in michigan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(strike, be in michigan)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(strike, be in illinois)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(strike, be in illinois)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(strike, be in illinois)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(strike, be in michigan)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(strike, be in chicago)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(strike, be in chicago)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strike, be in illinois)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(strike, be in chicago)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(strike, be in chicago)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(strike, be in arizona)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(strike, be in arizona)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(action, is jackson kevin hart)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(strike, be in arizona)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(action, is jackson kevin hart)