strike: were risky in 1920

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.66
, attack
Weight: 0.61
, form
Weight: 0.61
, fight
Weight: 0.60
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings raid
Weight: 0.33
, boycott
Weight: 0.33
, dismissal
Weight: 0.32
, counterattack
Weight: 0.32
, blast
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
were risky in 1920 1.00
were risky for workers 0.91
be dangerous 0.79
is dangerous 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(attack, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(strike, were risky in 1920)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(attack, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(attack, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(attack, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(strike, were risky in 1920)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(strike, were risky in 1920)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(strike, were risky for workers)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(strike, were risky for workers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(strike, were risky for workers)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(strike, were risky for workers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(strike, were risky in 1920)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(strike, were risky in 1920)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(attack, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(strike, were risky in 1920) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(attack, is dangerous)