stripper: have long nails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.69
, character
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, girl
Weight: 0.49
Siblings pregnant woman
Weight: 0.36
, dancer
Weight: 0.36
, old woman
Weight: 0.35
, prostitute
Weight: 0.35
, waitress
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long nails 1.00
has physical part nails 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, have long nails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(prostitute, has physical part nails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(prostitute, has physical part nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(prostitute, has physical part nails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(prostitute, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(prostitute, have long nails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(stripper, have long nails)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(stripper, has physical part nails)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(stripper, has physical part nails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(stripper, has physical part nails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(stripper, has physical part nails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(stripper, have long nails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(stripper, have long nails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(prostitute, has physical part nails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(stripper, have long nails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(prostitute, have long nails)