structure: be related in living thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.68
, modification
Weight: 0.63
, project
Weight: 0.63
, mechanism
Weight: 0.62
Siblings pyramid
Weight: 0.73
, system
Weight: 0.72
, empire state building
Weight: 0.70
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.69
, arch
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related in living thing 1.00
be related in living things 0.96
be related 0.79
be important in life 0.77
be important to life 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(system, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(system, be related)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(system, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(structure, be related in living thing)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(structure, be related in living things)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(structure, be related in living things)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(structure, be related in living things)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(structure, be related)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(structure, be related)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(structure, be important in life)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(structure, be related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(structure, be important in life)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(structure, be related in living things)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(structure, be important to life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(structure, be important to life)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(structure, be important in life)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(structure, be important to life)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important in life)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(structure, be related)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(structure, be important to life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(structure, be related in living thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(structure, be related in living thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(structure, be related in living thing)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(system, be related)